Israel vs Hamas:
A Message to the Fence-Sitters
This is directed at those who claim to be critical thinkers, those who attempt to balance blame and moral equivalence within the Israeli-Hamas conflict. It is an unfortunate fact that civilian lives have been lost on both sides, but context is crucial. On one side, there's an explicit agenda to eliminate Jews, coupled with acts that defy description.
Despite these horrific actions, including the deliberate targeting of women and children for acts as gruesome as rape, murder, and kidnapping, there are individuals who audaciously equate a military response that targets terrorists, their weaponry, and ammunition with the same moral standing. It is imperative to acknowledge that these terrorists choose to use human lives as shields, and they bear responsibility for the civilian casualties.
Despite claims of neutrality, actions speak louder than words. Attendees of rallies chanting 'from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free' should understand the implication of this slogan – a call for the removal of all Jews from the region. If one truly desires to stay impartial and prioritize civilian well-being, the absence of Israeli flags at these rallies and the presence of Hamas flags indicate a clear bias.
The difference between a side dedicated to eradicating Jews and a side dedicated to safeguarding them is glaring. Advocating for a ceasefire does not equate to seeking peace; it's merely a temporary pause that allows terrorists to regroup.
Remember, the world is watching this conflict closely. Throughout history, there have been moments where individuals had the chance to confront evil. This is one such opportunity.
GET OFF THE FENCE!
Thank you, Rog!
I note the ease with which citizen journalist types derail the chanters. In London there is a combination of immigrants flying their flags and white natives joining into the chants.
It is interesting to watch an interviewer walk them through the whole thing. Usually something like this.
Questioner: From the river to the sea... Which river is it?
Young person: Em, I don't know. My geography isn't so good. The Nile?
Questioner: It's the River Jordan. Which sea is it?
Young person: Em, the Mediterranean?
Questioner: That's right. Now what does it mean for Palestine to be free? Free of what?
Young person: Em, well Israel.
Questioner: Does that include the Arab-Israelis? There are two million of them.
Young person: Well, no. Obviously not.
Questioner: So just the Jews?
Awkward pause as images of the Third Reich swim in to focus.
Questioner: So where should the Jews be sent? Where should they be relocated to?
Another awkward pause as the implications of the chant blossom in their mind. Relocation sounds awfully familiar. A nice clinical term that has been used in the past...
It is that easy. That is what programmed messages delivered in neat slogans are like. Absolutely no thought required. If they are told they are fighting oppression it doesn't matter if it is Jews, the unvaxxed or Hitler, as crazy as that sounds.
The NPC phenomenon seems to be real and I suspect the Israel-Gaza conflict is simply demonstrating this.